[BVARC] 146.940 Repeater Problems and Repeater Operation

Eddie Runner eddie.runner at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 17 19:57:16 CDT 2023


 Hi Marvin,
the CW had a call sign,, I presume the call sign was of the senderthe call sign i heard one morning calling CQ was w5thc.. I do not think it was illegal.. I think you can use CW on any ham band.
Eddie (NU5K)

    On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 06:52:39 PM CDT, Suggs, Marvin (KTRK-TV) via BVARC <bvarc at bvarc.org> wrote:  
 
 Did they find out who was sending CW over the 146.94 machine a week ago Friday?MarvinN5RKW 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 17, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Eddie Runner via BVARC <bvarc at bvarc.org> wrote:




This Message is From an External Sender
Caution: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
When something like this happens its pretty simple for EVERYONE to monitorthe 146.34 input to the repeater and forward signal reports.. Most folks have a revbutton... this is what its for.   
Last night Suzanne (KF5GWZ) and I set out to find the problemand we did.
We had a few previous reports (Guesses??) like Mike forwarded, but that didn't match the results Suzanne and I were getting.. I think the area that was under suspicion WAS NOT the area we went to... All those calls would have been a waste..
We used the signal strength meter on a mobile rig (icom r7000) and a handheld with a signal strength meter as well, monitoring 146.34.
Took a little over an hour then after it was fixed,we stopped and had some good tx mex for dinner..
It was a fun Friday Date night..  ha haWish more folks were out there to join us, we had a blast..
Eddie (NU5K)PS - good subject for future BVARC training...
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 02:07:05 PM CDT, John Denison via BVARC <bvarc at bvarc.org> wrote:

I'm glad this issue was resolved, and for what its worth, there are at least 50 hams in the area which would have made it time consuming to contact each one. This was a good (not good) unplanned fox hunt, and it reminds me of the time there was interference on the 146.92 repeater years ago. At the time I had an Icom mobile which had an attenuator on the squelch control, so it was relatively easy to narrow the signal down to a few square blocks.

This is one of the things I like about ham radio the most... hams coming together to offer a service or resolve an issue.

73
John Denison
KD5YOU


________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC at bvarc.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyjuqEIKKA$
Publicly available archives are available here: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/__;!!Om87Lau1Cg!KnnpCyVbXy-lZSz_HgnYMbE8nGY7kwr4wfprArQZlnCrh4Faw6ftcL7jhFb1sqy7n3DWgyhCgqte1Q$  

________________________________________________
Brazos Valley Amateur Radio Club

BVARC mailing list
BVARC at bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Publicly available archives are available here: https://www.mail-archive.com/bvarc@bvarc.org/ 
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.bvarc.org/pipermail/bvarc_bvarc.org/attachments/20230618/5eb1fce3/attachment.htm>


More information about the BVARC mailing list